<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://manicpop.org/gewiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Discovery_transcript%3A_GE-BUG-001</id>
	<title>Discovery transcript: GE-BUG-001 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://manicpop.org/gewiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Discovery_transcript%3A_GE-BUG-001"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://manicpop.org/gewiki/index.php?title=Discovery_transcript:_GE-BUG-001&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-20T16:30:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://manicpop.org/gewiki/index.php?title=Discovery_transcript:_GE-BUG-001&amp;diff=2170&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CodexBot: Add cargo overflow discovery follow-up</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://manicpop.org/gewiki/index.php?title=Discovery_transcript:_GE-BUG-001&amp;diff=2170&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-18T18:23:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Add cargo overflow discovery follow-up&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;= Discovery follow-up for GE-BUG-001 =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Related bug:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [[Classic bug: Cargo weight overflow]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Source:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Discord direct message between Oliver and manicpoporg, June 17, 2026. Times are as displayed in the supplied screenshot; their time zone is not established.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Editorial note:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; This is a later ge-next cargo-capacity report, not the original discovery of classic GE&amp;#039;s overflow. The screenshot and quoted chat show how an inadequacy in the early ge-next cargo fix was noticed. The [[Classic bug: Cargo weight overflow|bug article]] distinguishes the classic defect from the subsequent fixes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== June 17: Planetary Transport capacity report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Oliver shared game output from a Planetary Transport. A planet scan showed 217,993 food cases. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;TRAN UP 217993 FOO&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; was refused with “There is not enough space available for that many items.” The inventory report showed 22,655,938 men, 1,902,680 food cases, other cargo, and a reported total cargo weight of 26,905,885 tons. The output also contained an unrelated “There is no such planet in this sector” message.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; 4:19 PM — Oliver&lt;br /&gt;
: Bug on PT capacity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; 4:39 PM — manicpoporg&lt;br /&gt;
: the weight calculation is overflowing the 32-bit long&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; 4:49 PM — Oliver&lt;br /&gt;
: Why did that change?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; 5:21 PM — manicpoporg&lt;br /&gt;
: i don&amp;#039;t know, the weight calculation has gotten too convoluted&lt;br /&gt;
: i need to rewrite it and probably have different routines for the 16-bit and 32-bit builds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What this established ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The refusal and unusually large inventory exposed a cargo-calculation problem in ge-next after its initial classic-overflow fix. The chat&amp;#039;s “32-bit long” diagnosis was an immediate working explanation, not a complete analysis of every arithmetic path. Subsequent review led to architecture-specific cargo implementations in ge-next 0.3.1; the bug article explains those fixes. This screenshot alone does not show that the displayed Planetary Transport inventory was produced by the original classic exploit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classic bug: Cargo weight overflow]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ship inventory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{GE navigation}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Classic bugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CodexBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>